Well that’s the
general perspective of God. New earth thinkers would have it that exact.
The poles of thought around
creation, range from literal to lateral. The literal Sadducee's of our age hold
to a very black and white, narrow and legalistic interpretation of the world around
us. Not that our faith is enhanced thereby. Not that it makes any real
difference.
On the contrary,
describing God as a wand-wielding wizard, capable of making worlds within 24
hours, poses even more questions. After all, why 24 hours when a second would
do?
The fact that time, as
we know it, was only defined on day 4, seems to not matter. Nor does it
evidently matter that it took thousands of years to bring Jesus to the cross.
I do not know how or
why, in that model, God made the Unicorn of scripture or Behemoth, and removed
them a day later together with the dinosaurs and fossils that have been
unearthed from times long ago. Oh well, whatever, that is all the least of our
problems.
The biggest dilemma
for me, is that the literalist view makes a sham of the cross.
That said, I actually want to introduce another
thought
I concede that God is
omnipresent – He has to be to touch all of us and relate to us individually.
One of the benefits of the cross was the replacement of a distance temple with
the imminence of God, who sees and feels even the faintest cry or the most lost
sheep.
Many scriptures
confirm His omnipresence. That, by implication, makes Him omniscient, for if He
has seen everything, He knows everything. I am not convinced of omnipotent.
We can move mountains
and tame rivers, but we use man-made machines to do that. Is it not possible that
the bulldozers of God were black-holes, super novae, gravity and so on? He
certainly uses and lives by the laws of the universe that He made.
To be more precise Jesus did it all
He was the agent of
creation (Colossians 1:16). He was at the cusp of
time and eternity, but on our side of the line, inside time. Thus He is called the
ancient of days and has white hair.
Logically, even
mathematically, Jesus had a beginning. He is the son of the Father. His
beginning = ¥ + n or infinity + some elapse of time.
About eternity
The biggest concern I
have with our many perspectives of God, is not imposed by scripture. It is the
assumption that He lives in an eternal now, in a flux of past, present and
future.
I reject that. It
would mean that God is constantly reliving what His Son so painfully resolved.
I rather lean to the Einsteinian idea of an event horizon. It is defined as a
boundary of space-time, which in layman’s terms means the boundary of an event
in a given time and place.
What I allude to is
the idea that the creation was an event horizon with a discrete beginning and
future end. It dawned, it reached its fullness at Calvary and it will set.
God lives in a linear eternity
The number system is
infinite. You can go from minus infinity to positive infinity. However, no
matter how long the line, it is still linear.
It proceeds logically
from left to right or from lowest to highest. It is never an amorphous
flux of events colliding into an eternal now, where past, present and future
are one.
I do not know enough
about God to stand on my head for this, but I am willing to state with
conviction that the ordered, rational God of my experience is linear.
An obscure little reference
in Revelation 8:1 says there was “silence about an half hour”. It confirms that
heaven does have a concept of the linear nature of time and of time lapse. A
half hour in that world may have been eons for us, but it was marked.
They knew that such a
moment had elapsed and they waited for it to be so.
Thus, while I gladly
believe that God is eternal, I see that as still being a time-based thing, but
not as we understand time. It was a logical progression through the event horizons
of an advancing realm.
Acts 17:26 and Daniel
2:21 confirm that God appoints “seasons” and marks their onset and conclusion. Matthew
24:36 confirms that the marker of such “seasons” is the Father. He is the
divine metronome. It is His sole prerogative.
That changes things for creation
A linear eternity
brings a different perspective to the new earth argument. If God does advance
along a logical continuum and can mark out the knots in the rope to record the
passage of time as a half hour, then His concept of a day is almost certainly
very different to ours.
Thus a day to Him is a
thousand years to us and vice versa.
If Jesus were among us
today, He would still oppose the lateralist Pharisees who interpret the
scripture too selectively, too expediently, all in a misguided quest for
relevance. His concern would simply be, “are you relevant to man and irrelevant
to God?”
I dare not, ever,
compromise His precious, priceless truth to fit my reality. By His spoken word,
the dark void acquired life and became a profound creation. That same word,
spoken into my life, transformed me into something of value to Him.
The contemporary
interpretations of scripture are at risk of departing from the faith into a philosophy
that will once again exclude this Jesus as an inconvenient truth.
Yet, the same Jesus
would undoubtedly reserve a degree of disdain and rebuke for the literalist Sadducees,
who have subjected our faith to ridicule because what they profess is simply
not supportable in science.
Not a problem, they
might say. ‘Yes a problem’, God would say, for the invisible things of God are
clearly known and understood by what is made (Romans 1). If the two do not
reconcile, faith in God or our understanding of Him, will falter. Well so Paul
thinks and I like Paul.
(c) Peter Missing @ Bethelstone.com
No comments:
Post a Comment